News & Updates

How Businesses Can Improve Their Cybersecurity Posture in 2025: Insights from 2024 Trends In an increasingly interconnected world, improving cybersecurity remains a critical priority for businesses of all sizes. The year 2024 has seen a surge in cyberattacks, with threat actors leveraging more sophisticated methods to exploit vulnerabilities. As we look to 2025, it’s clear that a proactive and adaptive approach to improving cybersecurity is essential. Drawing from 2024 trends, this article explores key recommendations for improving cybersecurity posture in the year ahead. 1.Improving cybersecurity with AI-Driven Threat Detection During 2024, AI-driven cyberattacks became more prevalent, with adversaries using AI to craft more convincing phishing attempts and automate attacks at scale. Businesses can fight fire with fire by adopting AI-driven threat detection tools. These systems analyze vast datasets in real-time, identifying anomalies that may signal a breach. Recommendation:• Invest in AI-powered security platforms which provide real-time detection and automated responses. Cristie Software included Advanced Anomaly Detection driven by machine learning (ML) algorithms. This can be run at any time to compare snapshots of system backups to detect and provide early warning of suspicious file encryption.• Ensure staff receive training to understand and operate these systems effectively. 2024 Insight: According to a report by Gartner, AI-driven security solutions have reduced threat response times by up to 60%. 2. Zero Trust Architecture (ZTA) Implementation “Trust no one” became a fundamental principle for improving cybersecurity in 2024. The Zero Trust model verifies every user and device attempting to access a network, reducing the risk of insider threats and compromised credentials. Recommendation:• Adopt Zero Trust principles by segmenting networks, enforcing multi-factor authentication (MFA), and continually verifying user identity.• Utilize solutions like Microsoft’s Zero Trust framework and tools from companies like Zscaler and Okta. 2024 Insight: In a survey by Forrester, organizations that implemented ZTA reported a 45% reduction in security incidents. 3. Strengthen Endpoint Security with Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Endpoints (laptops, mobile devices, and IoT devices) remain one of the primary targets for attackers. In 2024, the integration of Extended Detection and Response (XDR) tools helped consolidate endpoint, network, and server security into a single cohesive system for improving cybersecurity. Recommendation:• Deploy XDR solutions like SentinelOne, Sophos, or Trend Micro to achieve unified threat detection and response.• Regularly update endpoint security protocols and conduct frequent security audits.• Incorporate system recovery solutions from Cristie Software to ensure quick recovery from endpoint failures or cyber incidents, minimizing downtime and data loss. 2024 Insight: IBM Security’s X-Force Threat Intelligence Index indicated that endpoint-related breaches accounted for 48% of all incidents in 2024. 4. Focus on Awareness Training to Improve Cybersecurity Human error remains one of the leading causes of security breaches. In 2024, phishing and social engineering attacks increased by 30%, underscoring the need for robust employee training to improve cybersecurity awareness. Recommendation:• Conduct regular cybersecurity awareness training sessions to help employees recognize phishing attempts, ransomware, and social engineering tactics.• Use platforms like KnowBe4 or Proofpoint for simulated phishing campaigns and educational modules. 2024 Insight: A Verizon Data Breach Investigations Report found that 68% of breaches involved a non-malicious human element, like a person falling victim to a social engineering attack or making an error. 5. Adopt Continuous Monitoring and Incident Response Plans Continuous monitoring of your IT environment ensures that threats are detected early. An effective Incident Response (IR) plan ensures quick action when breaches occur, improving cybersecurity resilience. Recommendation:• Implement 24/7 Security Operations Center (SOC) monitoring through in-house teams or Managed Security Service Providers (MSSPs) like Arctic Wolf and Rapid7.• Develop a comprehensive IR plan and conduct regular tabletop exercises to ensure readiness.• Utilize Cristie Software’s system recovery solutions to enable swift recovery in the aftermath of a cyber incident. The simulated recovery feature of our software enables organizations to ensure correct functionality of their recovery jobs without interrupting ongoing protection. In addition, our isolated network recovery mechanism allows systems to be recovered into a cleanroom environment for cyber forensics and integrity verification following an attack. 2024 Insight: Companies with well-documented IR plans reduced breach recovery times by 35%, according to a Ponemon Institute study. 6. Enhance Cloud Security Measures With cloud adoption increasing, cloud security breaches in 2024 highlighted the importance of improving cybersecurity measures for data stored in cloud environments. Recommendation:• Use cloud security solutions such as those offered by AWS, Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud Platform (GCP) to enforce strong access controls, encryption, and threat detection.• Ensure compliance with frameworks like the Cloud Security Alliance (CSA) Cloud Controls Matrix.• Integrate Cristie Software’s recovery solutions to ensure cloud workloads can be restored quickly in the event of data loss or a breach. Our recovery and replication software provides the capability to recovery or replicate system to a variety of cloud platforms. CloneManager our replication software provides a simple way to automate and accelerate cloud onboarding or to utilize the cloud as a failover target. 2024 Insight: According to Cloud Security Alliance’s 2024 report, 67% of cloud security breaches were caused by misconfigurations. 7. Regularly Update and Patch Systems Unpatched vulnerabilities remain a favorite entry point for cybercriminals. In 2024, attacks exploiting known vulnerabilities increased dramatically, emphasizing the importance of improving cybersecurity through timely updates. Recommendation:• Implement an automated patch management system.• Prioritize patching critical vulnerabilities and ensure all software and firmware are up-to-date.• Consider using Cristie Software’s system recovery solutions to quickly revert to secure states in case of a compromised patch. 2024 Insight: CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog reported a 52% rise in attacks targeting unpatched systems in 2024. Conclusion As we move into 2025, businesses must adapt to an evolving threat landscape shaped by the trends of 2024. By investing in AI-driven detection, implementing Zero Trust, enhancing endpoint security, and prioritizing cybersecurity awareness, organizations can focus on improving cybersecurity posture. Incorporating system recovery solutions from Cristie Software ensures businesses can recover swiftly and efficiently from potential cyber incidents. Proactive measures and continuous improvement will be key to protecting assets, maintaining customer trust, and ensuring business continuity in the

The Importance of Automated System Recovery: Insights Backed by the 2024 Cohesity Global Cyber Resilience Report In today’s increasingly hostile cyber landscape, the ability to quickly recover systems after an attack or failure is more crucial than ever. Subsequently Automated system recovery is not just a convenience—it’s a necessity for maintaining business continuity, minimizing downtime, and protecting critical data. At Cristie Software, we understand that fast, reliable system recovery can mean the difference between a minor disruption and a catastrophic business failure. Recent reports from Cohesity highlight the rising challenges organizations face in managing system recovery after a cyber incident. These insights underline why automation is key to ensuring resilience and recovery readiness. Therefore let’s explore the importance of automated system recovery and how it can protect your business from costly disruptions. The Growing Threat of Cyberattacks and Downtime According to the 2024 Cohesity Global Cyber Resilience Report, an alarming 67% of organizations have experienced ransomware attacks in the past year. More troubling is the fact that many of these organizations struggle to recover efficiently after such incidents. Recovery delays can result in: • Prolonged Downtime: Businesses can take anywhere from 1 to 3 days or more to fully recover operations, leading to financial losses and reputational damage. • Data Loss: Inefficient recovery processes can lead to incomplete restoration, resulting in lost data that can be critical for operations. • Increased Costs: The longer the downtime, the higher the cost. Accordingly the report estimates that downtime can cost enterprises thousands of dollars per minute. This underscores the need for a robust, automated system recovery solution that can restore operations quickly and accurately, mitigating these risks. Why Manual Recovery Processes Are No Longer Viable Traditional, manual recovery processes are time-consuming, error-prone, and often incapable of meeting the demands of modern IT environments. Manual recovery typically involves: 1. Locating and Validating Backups: Ensuring that the backups are current, uncorrupted, and usable. 2. Manual Reconfiguration: Rebuilding servers, re-installing operating systems, and reconfiguring applications. 3. Coordination Challenges: Synchronizing various teams to execute recovery steps in the correct sequence. Cohesity’s research shows that 78% of IT professionals believe that manual recovery processes are a major bottleneck during disaster recovery. In an environment where every second counts, manual methods simply cannot keep up. The Benefits of Automated System Recovery Automated system recovery provides a streamlined, reliable, and efficient solution to these challenges. Here’s why automation is critical: 1. Speed and Efficiency When recovery processes are automated recovery times can be reduced from hours or days to mere minutes. By leveraging tools that automate the restoration of systems, applications, and configurations, businesses can resume operations faster, minimizing the impact of downtime. 2. Accuracy and Consistency Automation eliminates human error by following pre-defined recovery workflows. Each step of the recovery process is executed consistently, ensuring that systems are restored accurately every time. 3. Regular Testing and Validation Cristie Software automated recovery solutions allow for regular testing without disrupting production systems. Consequently this ensures that your recovery plans are always up-to-date and ready for deployment. Cohesity’s reports emphasize the importance of frequent testing to maintain recovery readiness. 4. Scalability As IT environments grow more complex, automated recovery solutions can scale to handle multiple systems simultaneously, whether on-premises, in the cloud, or in hybrid environments. This ensures comprehensive protection regardless of infrastructure size. 5. Reduced Costs By minimizing downtime and the resources needed for manual intervention, automated recovery reduces the overall cost of system recovery. Faster recovery means fewer losses and lower risk of compliance penalties. How Cristie Software Delivers Automated System Recovery We provide advanced recovery solutions designed to meet the needs of modern businesses. Our automated system recovery tools offer: • Bare Metal Recovery: Recover entire systems, including operating systems, applications, and configurations, directly to new hardware or virtual environments. Our Bare Metal recovery for Cohesity (CoBMR) works seamlessly to provide automated recovery for any machine within Cohesity Data Protect. • Cross-Platform Compatibility: Support for physical, virtual, and cloud-based infrastructures. • Regular Testing and Validation: Automated testing capabilities ensure your recovery plans are always ready for deployment. • Integration with Leading Data Management Solutions: Our solutions seamlessly integrate with platforms like Cohesity to enhance your overall cyber resilience. Cohesity’s Insights: The Need for Resilient Automated System Recovery The research from Cohesity paints a clear picture: cyber threats are not going away, and businesses must be prepared to respond effectively. Automated system recovery is a cornerstone of resilience, enabling organizations to recover faster, reduce errors, and maintain business continuity. By combining Cristie Software’s automated recovery solutions with robust data protection platforms like Cohesity, businesses can achieve a comprehensive defense strategy that ensures they can recover swiftly from any incident. Conclusion In conclusion, backups are essential, but without automated system recovery, they fall short of providing true business resilience. As cyber threats grow more sophisticated and downtime becomes more costly, automation is no longer optional—it’s a necessity. At Cristie Software, we’re committed to helping businesses safeguard their critical systems and data with automated recovery solutions that work when you need them most. Don’t leave your recovery to chance. Learn how Cristie Software can enhance your resilience by visiting www.cristie.com/solutions/ today. Be resilient. Be ready. Automate your recovery. Contact the Cristie Software team if you are looking to improve system recovery and replication within your organization, or to learn more about system replication and our system recovery integration with leading backup solutions from vendors including IBM, Dell Technologies, Rubrik and Cohesity. Finally, learn how we are helping companies modernize system recovery in our Use Case pages.

The Top 5 Causes of System Recovery Failure and How to Avoid Them In today’s always-on business environment, system recovery is more than just a technical safeguard, it’s a critical component of business continuity. When a system recovery plan fails, the consequences can include extended downtime, lost revenue, and damaged reputation. At Cristie Software, we specialize in providing advanced recovery solutions that minimize these risks. To help you strengthen your recovery strategy, let’s examine the top five causes of system recovery failure and how to address them effectively. 1. Lack of Regular System Recovery Testing The most common reason for system recovery failure is insufficient testing. Even a meticulously designed recovery plan can fall short if it hasn’t been tested under realistic conditions. Without testing, unforeseen issues, such as misconfigured backups or incompatible systems, often remain undetected. How to Avoid This: • Test Regularly: Schedule routine recovery drills to ensure that your system recovery plan is functional and up-to-date.• Simulate Real-World Scenarios: Use tools like Cristie Software’s recovery testing solutions to simulate disaster events and verify system behavior.• Document Results: Record the outcomes of tests to identify weak points and fine-tune the recovery process. 2. Outdated System Recovery Plans A system recovery plan that doesn’t account for changes in IT infrastructure or business operations is a recipe for failure. Many organizations fail to update their recovery plans after implementing new software, expanding storage capacities, or adopting hybrid cloud environments. How to Avoid This: • Establish a Review Schedule: Update your system recovery plan whenever there’s a significant change in your IT environment.• Centralize Documentation: Use Cristie’s solutions to automate system recovery and centralize the documentation of system configurations, ensuring alignment with the latest setup.• Assign Ownership: Designate a recovery team responsible for maintaining and updating the plan. 3. Incomplete or Corrupt System Backups System recovery depends on the availability of accurate and complete backups. Partial backups or data corruption during the backup process can make recovery impossible, leading to prolonged downtime and data loss. How to Avoid This: • Automate Backups: Leverage automated backup tools that ensure consistency and completeness across all systems.• Use Backup Validation: Cristie’s solutions offer system recovery simulation to confirm that data is intact and accessible before an issue arises.• Adopt Redundancy: Store backups across multiple locations, including offsite and cloud-based storage, to mitigate risks. The 3-2-1 backup rule is a widely recognized data protection strategy that recommends maintaining three copies of your data: the original and two backups. These copies should be stored on two different types of media, with one copy kept off-site to safeguard against data loss due to hardware failures, cyberattacks, or natural disasters   4. Hardware and Software Incompatibility When recovering systems, hardware and software incompatibilities can create bottlenecks. For example, legacy recovery tools may struggle with modern IT environments, causing delays or outright failures. Problems very often arise when recovering to dissimilar hardware due to device driver incompatibilities. Cristie Software system recovery tools can overcome this issue with Dissimilar Hardware Technology that can automatically insert missing or alternative device drivers during the recovery process, eliminating the need for manual intervention.  How to Avoid This: • Upgrade Tools Regularly: Use Cristie’s state-of-the-art recovery solutions, which are designed to handle modern, hybrid, and legacy systems seamlessly.• Standardize Your Environment: Reduce variability by standardizing hardware and software configurations wherever possible.• Test Compatibility: Test your recovery tools with existing and updated systems to avoid surprises during critical recovery operations. 5. Human Error Leading to System Recovery Failure Even the most robust recovery plans can be derailed by human error. Missteps such as skipping critical steps, applying incorrect configurations, or misunderstanding recovery procedures can result in significant delays. How to Avoid This: • Provide Training: Ensure that your IT staff is trained in executing the system recovery plan effectively.• Create Step-by-Step Guides: Use Cristie’s tools to generate clear and automated recovery workflows, minimizing reliance on manual input.• Embrace Automation: Cristie Software recovery tools can automate repetitive recovery tasks to reduce the risk of mistakes and accelerate recovery times. For more complex recovery workflows our software offers recovery orchestration which allows specific recovery tasks to be defined and processed in a user defined sequence. How Cristie Software Enhances System Recovery At Cristie Software, we understand the complexities of system recovery and have built our solutions to help businesses avoid the pitfalls that lead to recovery failures. Our tools focus on: • Rapid Recovery: Minimize downtime with solutions that restore systems in minutes, not hours.• Comprehensive Testing: Simulate recovery scenarios to validate your plan without disrupting daily operations.• Cross-Platform Compatibility: Seamlessly recover systems across diverse IT environments, including physical, virtual, and cloud. Whether you’re recovering a single server or an entire data center, Cristie Software provides the confidence and reliability you need to protect your business. Conclusion Avoiding system recovery failures requires proactive planning, regular testing, and the right tools. By addressing common pitfalls such as outdated plans, incomplete backups, and human error, businesses can ensure resilience and continuity in the face of disruptions. At Cristie Software, we’re here to help you build and maintain a recovery strategy that works when you need it most. Learn more about our advanced recovery solutions by visiting www.cristie.com/solutions/  Secure your business, minimize downtime, and ensure operational continuity with Cristie Software. Contact the Cristie Software team if you are looking to improve system recovery and replication within your organization, or to learn more about system replication and our system recovery integration with leading backup solutions from vendors including IBM, Dell Technologies, Rubrik and Cohesity. Learn how we are helping companies modernize system recovery in our Use Case pages.

The extent of Cybercrime in the US Pharmaceutical Industry Cybercrime in the pharmaceutical industry is very prominent in the United States due to its high-value intellectual property (IP), sensitive patient data, and essential role in healthcare. The extent of cybercrime in this sector is significant, as evidenced by several key factors and incidents: Prevalence of Cyberattacks in Pharmaceuticals & Healthcare High Incidence of Breaches:  Reports have shown a notable increase in data breaches across U.S. pharmaceutical companies. Sensitive data exposures have been linked to both malicious cyberattacks and accidental leaks, often leading to significant regulatory scrutiny and fines. IBM Security’s 2024 Cost of a Data Breach Report highlights the financial impacts of data breaches on industries, including healthcare and pharmaceuticals, with the U.S. healthcare and pharmaceutical sectors ranking 1st and 6th respectively for the highest costs per breach. (Read the IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2024) Widespread Vulnerabilities: Research by Reposify in 2021 found that 92% of the pharmaceutical organizations surveyed had at least one exposed database, and 99% had at least one remote access platform exposed to the internet, indicating significant vulnerabilities. Types of Cyber Threats to Pharmaceutical companies Intellectual Property Theft: U.S. pharmaceutical companies, which invest heavily in research and development, are frequently targeted by cybercriminals aiming to steal proprietary drug formulas, clinical trial data, and research. Such IP theft can lead to severe financial losses and erode competitive advantages. Ransomware Attacks: This type of attack is especially concerning in the U.S., where ransomware incidents have targeted major pharmaceutical players, disrupting operations by encrypting essential data and demanding payment for its release. Phishing and Social Engineering: Many employees in U.S.-based pharmaceutical firms have been victims of social engineering attacks, which cybercriminals use to gain unauthorized access to confidential systems and data. Financial Impact of Cybercrime to the Pharmaceutical sector High Cost of Breaches: The average cost of a data breach in the U.S. pharmaceutical sector is among the highest of any industry, with costs often exceeding $5 million. The need for rapid response and recovery increases financial pressures, especially for firms actively involved in clinical trials and drug approvals.   Notable Cybersecurity Incidents in the U.S. Pharmaceutical sector NotPetya Attack on Merck (2017): This ransomware attack had a profound impact on Merck, a major U.S. pharmaceutical company, causing operational disruptions and financial losses estimated at around $870 million. The attack affected Merck’s production and distribution capabilities, underscoring the sector’s vulnerability to large-scale cyber disruptions. Pfizer and Moderna Phishing Attacks (2020): During the COVID-19 vaccine development period, both Pfizer and Moderna, two key players in the U.S. pharmaceutical landscape, were targeted by phishing and attempted breaches. These attacks aimed to compromise vaccine-related data, highlighting the risks around critical, time-sensitive research. Factors Contributing to Cybercrime in the U.S. Pharmaceutical sector Digital Transformation: The shift to digital systems and increased interconnectivity within U.S. pharmaceutical firms have expanded the attack surface, creating more entry points for cyber threats. Third-Party Risks: Dependence on third-party vendors and supply chain partners can introduce vulnerabilities. For example, attacks on U.S.-based vendors have indirectly impacted pharmaceutical operations. Regulatory Challenges: U.S. pharmaceutical companies must comply with multiple, evolving cybersecurity and privacy regulations, such as HIPAA. Any regulatory lapses or breaches can result in penalties and heightened vulnerability to cyberattacks. In our previous article we highlighted the sections within HIPPA that specifically detail system recovery requirements for companies governed by the regulation. Conclusion In summary, U.S.-based pharmaceutical companies face a high and escalating risk from cybercrime. To address this threat, they must implement rigorous cybersecurity measures and undertake a modernization of system recovery solutions to protect their sensitive data, ensure operational continuity, and safeguard public health. Contact the Cristie Software team if you are looking to improve system recovery and replication within pharmaceutical and healthcare, or to learn more about system replication and our system recovery integration with leading backup solutions from vendors including IBM, Dell Technologies, Rubrik and Cohesity. Learn how we are helping pharmaceutical and healthcare companies modernize system recovery in our Use Case pages.

Manufacturing is facing a new era of cybercrime Ransomware in manufacturing is rising fast. Manufacturing companies face a growing array of challenges related to cybercrime, largely due to the evolving nature of their IT systems and their reliance on operational technology (OT). These challenges stem from the convergence of IT and OT environments, the complexity of supply chains, and the shift towards more digital and connected manufacturing processes (Industry 4.0). In many cases, there is a need for modernization of system recovery and data protection technologies to combat threats that have emerged for a more connected OT environment. Below are some key challenges: 1. Convergence of IT and OT IT/OT Integration: In modern manufacturing, IT systems (information technology) handle business functions like finance, inventory, and communications, while OT (operational technology) systems control physical processes such as machinery, robotics, and production lines. These two environments are increasingly integrated for improved efficiency, but they have different security requirements. OT systems are often older and not designed with cybersecurity in mind, making them vulnerable when connected to the broader IT network. Extended Lifecycle OT Systems: Many manufacturing plants use equipment with extended lifecycles that cannot be easily updated or patched. These systems, while operationally critical, were often designed without consideration for modern cyber threats, leading to vulnerabilities. Cristie Software system recovery provides support for legacy operating systems including Windows 7 desktop systems and Windows Server 2008 R2 enterprise platforms. Microsoft’s virtualization platform Hyper-V is supported from Hyper-V 2012 plus all editions of Microsoft Azure and Microsoft Azure Stack HCI. Cristie Software system recovery and replication solutions for Red Hat Linux platforms cater for the very latest editions with support extending back to Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5. 2. Ransomware and Disruptions to Production Ransomware Attacks: Ransomware has become a major threat to manufacturers. Attackers can lock down critical systems or encrypt data, halting production processes and causing significant financial losses. For instance, if a ransomware attack disables a factory’s production control systems, it could lead to downtime, missed deadlines, and reputational damage. Production Downtime: Even brief production stoppages can have a large financial impact, particularly in industries where just-in-time (JIT) manufacturing is crucial. Cyberattacks that disrupt OT systems can lead to costly downtime as plants scramble to restore operations. 3. Supply Chain Vulnerabilities Third-Party Risk: Manufacturing companies often rely on extensive global supply chains, working with multiple suppliers and contractors. These third-party relationships can introduce vulnerabilities, as cybercriminals may target less secure suppliers to gain access to larger manufacturers. The attack on Target in 2013, for example, occurred when hackers accessed the company’s systems through a third-party HVAC vendor. Supply Chain Attacks: Cybercriminals may inject malware into software or hardware components within the supply chain, compromising the final product delivered to customers. Supply chain attacks are difficult to detect and can propagate through an entire ecosystem of partners.   4. Intellectual Property Theft Targeting Trade Secrets: Manufacturing companies often possess valuable intellectual property (IP), including patents, product designs, and proprietary production methods. Cybercriminals, particularly those engaging in corporate espionage or state-sponsored attacks, seek to steal this IP for competitive or geopolitical advantage. For example, hackers may target a company’s R&D department to access confidential product designs. Data Breaches: Cybercriminals may breach IT systems to steal sensitive information about products, processes, and customers. Loss of intellectual property can result in competitive disadvantages and legal consequences, especially in highly competitive industries like automotive or aerospace. 5. Vulnerabilities in Industrial IoT (IIoT) Devices Increased Attack Surface: The rise of Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) devices has introduced new vulnerabilities. Connected sensors, controllers, and devices in factories can be exploited if not properly secured. Many IIoT devices lack built-in security features or use default passwords, making them prime targets for cyberattacks. Real-Time Monitoring and Control Risks: IIoT enables real-time data collection and monitoring, improving operational efficiency. However, it also means that an attack on these devices could disrupt real-time control systems, potentially leading to unsafe conditions, equipment damage, or production errors. 6. Phishing and Social Engineering Targeted Phishing Attacks: Manufacturing companies are not immune to phishing, and employees in these organizations may be targeted through deceptive emails designed to steal login credentials or introduce malware into the system. Spear-phishing attacks may be highly customized, impersonating suppliers or partners to trick recipients into clicking malicious links. Human Error: Social engineering attacks, such as phishing, exploit human vulnerabilities, often bypassing even well-established cybersecurity protocols. In environments where employees are managing both IT and OT systems, a single mistake could lead to a system-wide breach. 7. Lack of Cybersecurity Awareness and Training  Skill Gaps: Many manufacturing employees, especially those working in OT environments, may lack sufficient training in cybersecurity. The focus is often on ensuring the smooth operation of machinery and production lines, with less emphasis on understanding how cybersecurity impacts these systems. This creates an environment where staff may not recognize the signs of a cyberattack. Cybersecurity Culture: Some manufacturing environments may prioritize production efficiency over security practices, leading to a culture of neglect when it comes to cybersecurity. This can manifest as poor password management, delayed system patches, and a lack of proper network segmentation. 8. Regulatory and Compliance Challenges Compliance with Security Standards: Depending on the industry and the countries they operate in, manufacturers must comply with various cybersecurity standards and regulations. These can include the NIST Cybersecurity Framework in the U.S. or ISO 27001 globally. In the EU, regulations like the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) can come into play if the cyberattack results in the loss of personal data. Managing Multiple Standards: The challenge for manufacturing companies is that they often have to comply with multiple cybersecurity and safety regulations across different regions. Maintaining compliance can be difficult, particularly when IT and OT systems have different requirements. Conclusion Manufacturing companies must navigate a new and complex cybersecurity landscape where threats come from many directions. The integration of IT and OT systems, increased use of IIoT, and reliance on third-party suppliers make the sector highly vulnerable